Jurassic World Review

So I watched Jurassic World…


I went into this movie with a lot of anticipation and excitement. The original Jurassic Park is a timeless classic, it set the standard for practical and special effects and, in my opinion, many movies have failed to beat or even reach that standard. Jurassic World’s trailer was also really intriguing and the idea of trained velocoraptors that could be used as bloodhounds was just too awesome to resist.

Okay, basic plot: THE PARK IS OPEN! But don’t worry, the people who run it are making all the same mistakes you’ve come to expect from a Jurassic Park movie, like: cages that can’t properly contain the dinosaurs, not enough men and weapons to kill dinosaurs once they escape and just a general lack of thought about people’s safety. So yeah, people run away from dinosaurs, that’s literally the plot.


The opening ten minutes or so of Jurassic World are pure…magic! Seeing the doors open; the park filled with people – finally seeing the realisation of John Hammond’s dream on screen was amazing. The original score is also used to perfection in these opening scenes and perfetly taps into your nostalgia. These early scenes remind you of why you loved Jurassic Park and transport you back to the first time you enjoyed the movie. Now this was great for the first ten minutes but I came to watch a new movie and I don’t think the people who made this movie were interested in making a new movie. It just feels like a rehash of the original trilogy instead of an independent project.


But then again, I guess a movie like this, doesn’t really have much wiggle room in terms of plot. Eventually a dinosaur has to escape, our heroes have to run from it and that’s all you can do really. The problem is that the elements around the running from a dinosaur were lacking. The characters were extrememly one-dimensional and I didn’t really enjoy or care about any of their stories. All the characters are just stereotypical caricatures and are completely lacking heart. That’s one of the things that made the first Jurassic Park so entertaining, besides the dinosaurs, the characters themselves were extremly entertaining.

o-JURASSIC-WORLD-facebook I actually found Chris Pratt’s character (Owen Grady) in this movie quite annoying. He’s billed as this velocoraptor expert and badass but he doesn’t really do much in this movie to earn that tag. Most of the time all you see him do is hide or run away from things. I think Bryce Dallas Howard’s character (Claire Dearing) who’s just supposed to be some corporate figure with no experience in the field is more of a badass than Pratt in this movie. There’s also quite a sexist scene in this movie where we see Claire save Owen’s life and everybody around them runs to Owen and tells him how he’s such a badass even though Claire is the one who did all the heroics. But I’ll let the feminists argue that over.

There’s a bunch of subplots in this movie that are just glossed over and underdeveloped and you don’t really care about any of it. This movie is also trying to set up a franchise and a few characters who could have been really interesting are just used as pawns for the set up of future movies – it’s really frustrating.


The thing I hated most about this movie was the CGI and the appearance of the dinosaurs. They figured out how to make dinosaurs look realistic in 1993. It’s 2015, how do special effects look worse now? More importantly, why do they look worse? You have better technology, bigger budgets but you can’t do something that people could do with Windows 98? Come on!


The relationship Chris Pratt’s character Owen is supposed to have with the raptors is also never really explained. Apparently the fact that he’s raised them from birth stops them from eating him…could you not have a ten second montage of him training them? I mean it took Hiccup an entire movie to train Toothless in How To Train Your Dragon. Actually this movie is a poor man’s How To Train Your Dragon. There’s actually an entire section of this movie that is directly stolen from How to Train Your Dragon 2, no jokes!

Overall, this movie doens’t come anywhere near to the original. There is one amazing fight scene at the end of the movie but you have to sit through a lot of dull moments for that payoff. This movie’s worth a trip to the cinema but more out of respect to the original than because of its individual quality. 6/10

24 thoughts on “Jurassic World Review

  1. It’s a shame that it doesn’t match the quality of the original film, although I don’t hold Spielberg’s original in the same high-esteem as say Jaws or Raiders. For me, the original Jurassic Park is all about spectacle – many of the characters (Dern, Neill and the kids) are actually quite wooden.


    1. I actually think that the spectacle of the original wouldn’t have been as amazing without those characters. They weren’t these super complex characters but they had heart. Speaking of kids, wouldn’t you love to see a movie like this where the kids actually die? I’d have given this movie a much higher score if one of the kids died.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Haha! Well, it’d be a bold move to kill kids off in a summer blockbuster. I wish I felt the same way about the characters in JP (I liked Attenbrough and Goldblum). I just watched the film Twister, which Speilberg was attached as Executive Producer. I saw a LOT of similarities between Helen Hunt and Bill Paxton and Laura Dern and Sam Neill. Someone once described their characters as ‘cookie-cutter’ – I think that’s the most fitting description I’ve seen.


      2. Hahahaha that’s a good description but I think in a movie about dinosaurs or giant twisters, you need cookie cutters. You just need actors who have heart and won’t steal spotlight away from the actual spectacle.


      3. Oh no, I disagree. Look at Jaws, look at Raiders – SO rich in character, yet with all the spectacle of JP (actually more because it was mostly physical effects). Hope I’m not sounding too contrary – I’ve always liked JP, but I’ve never loved it.


  2. I caught the film about a month ago, and I can completely relate to your opinions. I was laughing in the cinema, especially at parts when I was not supposed to laugh. When the flying dinosaurs (sorry my knowledge of dinosaurs is near zero) escaped from their enclosure after the Indominus Rex invaded it, they attack the theme park visitors and that is one of the most ridiculous scenes I have ever seen in a thriller/adventure/mild horror film of this nature. It was so stupid, the animation of the dinosaurs were lame, and all I see was the dinosaurs toying around with the humans who are meaninglessly screaming all about. This is but one example of the stupid moments in the film. I was not amazed on the overall, though the story is engaging (maybe because I have not watched the previous three films in the franchise before).

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You need to watch the original Jurassic Park. It’s such a classic and also has a great musical score which I think you’d appreciate.
      The special effects in this movie are definitely laughable, they’re lacking the authenticity and innovation of the original.
      Everything is better in the original. You’ll actually be scared at moments when you’re meant to be scared and only laugh when funny things actually happen.
      Thanks for reading 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s